Health Law Attorney Blog

CARE Act Would Create Credentialing Standards for Medical Imaging Personnel

2010-08-17T20:24:04Z

A bill introduced in the Senate on August 5, 2010 would set forth minimum credentialing standards for medical personnel who "perform or plan" medical imaging or radiation therapy procedures. The Consistency, Accuracy, Responsibility and Excellence (CARE) in Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Act, introduced by Sen. Harkin (D-IA) and Sen. Enzi (R-WY) responds to concerns that procedures like x-rays, CT scans, and MRIs are increasingly being performed by personnel without adequate training, and would go into effect in 2013. Currently, standards vary from state to state; the CARE Act isn't meant to supplant or diminish more stringent standards that exist in some states. In addition, the Bill creates a grandfathering process for technicians who currently provide medical imaging or radiation therapy but don't meet the new education standards. It also establishes alternative standards for rural and underserved populations.

Given broad-based support, according to a press release from Sen. Harkin, the Bill is expected to pass this year.

]]> For more information, contact Carey F. Kalmowitz, Esq. or Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. at (248) 996-8510.

CMS Clarifies Timely Filing Requirements for Claims Including a Span of Time

2010-08-12T15:06:12Z

CMS has issued new guidance expanding on the Fee-for-Service Reimbursement instructions detailed in CR 6960 (which HLP had blogged about here). The earlier change request explained the basic standards stemming from the Section 6404 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: services billed more than one year after they were provided would be considered untimely filed and would not be paid.

The new CR 7080, explained in the MLN Matters 7080, sets forth instructions for timely billing for claims that span dates of service (i.e., "from... through..."). In particular, for institutional services, the one-year deadline will be based on the "through" date (the final date included in the claim). For professional services, the one-year deadline will be calculated on the "from" date.

]]> For more information on Medicare reimbursements, contact Abby Pendleton, Esq. or Jessica L. Gustafson, Esq. at (248) 996-8510.

RAC for Region D Posts New Anesthesia Care Package

2010-08-12T14:17:54Z

As HLP reported, in April, CMS requested that the RAC for Region D remove an anesthesia care package it had posted to its website. Now, the issue has been re-posted, with some changes:

Under NCCI Edit rules, the anesthesia care package consists of preoperative evaluation, standard preparation and monitoring services, administration of anesthesia, and post-anesthesia recovery care. Anesthesia CPT codes 00100 to 01999 include Evaluation & Management (E&M) services rendered on the day of the anesthesia procedure. If the only service provided is management of epidural/subarachnoid drug administration, then an E&M service should not be reported in addition to CPT code 01996.

The above lacks clarity around two issues: (1) whether this refers to E&M services provided only on the day of the procedure and E&M services billed with 01996; and (2) whether this is being treated as automated or a complex review. As you may recall, CMS directed the removal of the issue when it was written more broadly to include all E&M services billed before and after anesthesia.

You can view the posting by clicking "next" to page 2 of this RAC Info page.

]]> For more information on anesthesia and RACs, visit the HLP's RAC Page or contact Abby Pendleton, Esq. at (248) 996-8510.

Insurers Stepping in to Provide Technology to Doctors

2010-08-12T14:17:51Z

As the Wall Street Journal reported on August 9th, health-insurance companies progressively are initiating programs to equip doctors with high-tech patient records. Even with all of the focus on electronic health records ("EHR"), an estimated 80% of U.S. physicians and 90%of hospitals continue to use paper records. As HLP has discussed in a number of blogs, during this past year, the Obama administration included $27 billion in federal stimulus money to provide incentives for physicians and hospitals to convert to EHR. EHR, which represent a digital platform for storing patients' medical data, differ greatly from the billing, claim-management and patient-scheduling systems that upon which substantial number of providers continue to rely.

From insurers' perspective, the deployment of EHR creates the opportunity to diversify their operations as the federal health overhaul presents new challenges to their business of collecting premiums and paying claims. The insurance companies' involvement has raised a number of questions among consumer advocates who question how patient information will be used. As one advocate observed, insurers "have a conflict of interest, since they want to know about you so they can better price products to you or deny you."

For providers, migrating to an EHR platform affords opportunities in the form of practice efficiency, as well as access to federal tax incentives. Nonetheless, it is not anomalous for physicians to experience challenges with the process of converting to EHR; in addition, it is imperative to be cognizant of the legal issues implicated by the use of EHR.

]]> For questions or concerns regarding government investigations, please contact Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. or Carey Kalmowitz, Esq. at (212) 734-0128 or (248) 996-8510.

NY AG investigating health care credit cards

2010-08-05T19:28:31Z

Attorney General of New York, Andre Cuomo, initiated an investigation into health care credit cards after receiving a substantial number of complaints from consumers who were convinced by doctors and dentists to sign up for them.

The investigation will examine the financial incentives providers received from promoting the cards. Subpoenas have already been issued to 10 providers, while medical associations that endorse the card, including the American Dental Association and American Society of Plastic Surgeons, are being questioned as to the basis for their support. Cuomo also issued a subpoena to evaluate the operating structure of the three health care programs including: Chase Health Advance, Visa Health Benefits and Citibank Health Care.

According to Cuomo, providers have been inducing cardholders to finance procedures including dental work, veterinary services and cosmetic surgery not covered by insurance. In one example, CareCredit charged providers a fee to offer the card and gave rebates for part of the fee based on the amount of business providers get consumers to charge.

Other health care providers subpoenaed include: Allcare Dental Management Inc. of Buffalo; American Laser Centers of Farmington Hills, Mich.; Aspen Dental Management Inc. of East Syracuse; East Syracuse Family Dental Arts; Laser Cosmetica of New York City; Lifestyle Lift of Troy, Mich.; Northern Lights Chiropractic of Watertown; S & Y Diamond Dental P.C. of Brooklyn; Sunshine Dental of Watertown, and Toothsavers of New York City.

]]> For questions or concerns regarding government investigations, please contact Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. or Carey Kalmowitz, Esq. at (212) 734-0128 or (248) 996-8510.

OIG Advisory Opinion No. 10-11: The OIG Favorably Reviews a Company's Proposal to Encourage Health Care Providers to Use its Online Program to Schedule Meetings by Providing Charitable Donations in the Health Care Providers' Names

2010-08-04T18:33:24Z

On July 30, the OIG released advisory opinion no 10-11 (the "Opinion") which favorably reviewed a company's proposal to encourage health care providers to use its online program for scheduling meetings with manufacturer representatives by offering the health care provider an opportunity to select a public charity to which the company would make a monetary, charitable contribution in the health care provider's name.

Under the proposed arrangement, the company is not a health care provider or supplier but offers marketing services to pharmaceutical, medical, and diagnostic product manufacturers. According to the Opinion, the company has developed an online scheduling website, which pharmaceutical, medical, and diagnostic product manufacturers can use to schedule time with health care providers to educate them about new products. Under the proposed plan, manufacturers would pay a fee to enroll in the program and a fee for every five minute intervals of time scheduled with each health care provider. The company would then encourage health care providers to participate in its scheduling program by offering them the opportunity to designate a public charity to which the corporation would make a charitable contribution "in the name of" the health care provider. Further, under the proposed program, the health care provider would not be entitled to a tax deduction as a result of the donation.

The Opinion recognized the importance of charitable contributions from health care providers and suppliers and expressed caution in the exercise of enforcement in this area. However, the OIG also listed several examples of potentially problematic contributions (e.g., contributions to charities that provide free or below market value rate office space to a referral source) which are nothing more than disguised kickbacks intended to induce referrals. With respect to the proposed arrangement, however, the OIG found that the program was not problematic as it was structured to prevent health care providers from receiving any actual or expected economic benefit from the charitable donations (i.e., the donations would be made directly to the public charities), the health care providers would not be entitled to tax deductions, the charities would be 501(c)(3) organizations that are public charities, and would meet the public support test under section 509 (a) of the IRC, the charity would have sole discretion in the use of the donated funds, the funds would not be restricted or earmarked, and the health care providers would have to provide certificates that they (or an immediate family member) are not employees or board members of the charity. Additionally, the company's proposed arrangement would not be determined by a health care provider's prescribing choices, thus preventing any potential link between the selected charity and health care provider's referrals.

Accordingly, the OIG concluded that the charitable contributions would not constitute prohibited "remuneration . . . directly or indirectly . . . in cash or in kind" to the health care providers within the meaning of the anti-kickback statute.

]]> For more information on the anti-kickback statute or OIG opinion 10-11, please call or email Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. or Carey F. Kalmowitz, Esq. of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510

Medicare Strike Force Rounds Up 94 People in $251 Million False Billing Scheme

2010-08-02T20:53:55Z

As the HLP had previously reported, on July 16, the HHS Medicare Fraud Strike Force announced charges against 94 individuals for their alleged participation in schemes that collectively submitted more than $251 million in false claims to Medicare.

The charges are based on a variety of schemes including: physical therapy and occupational therapy schemes, home healthcare schemes, HIV infusion fraud schemes, and durable medical equipment (DME) schemes.

Of note, in Brooklyn, 22 defendants were charged for fraud which involved false billing for physical and occupational therapy and DME, while in Detroit, 11 defendants were charged for their alleged roles in schemes to submit fraudulent claims to Medicare for home health services, nerve conduction tests, and injection and infusion therapy sessions.

With these arrests, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that "Health care fraud is no longer a safe bet. The federal government is working aggressively--and collaboratively--to pursue health care criminals around the country and to bring these offenders to justice."

]]> For questions or concerns regarding government investigations or questions and concerns regarding fraud and abuse, please contact Adrienne Dresevic, Esq., Jessica L. Gustafson, Esq., Robert S. Iwrey, Esq., Carey Kalmowitz, Esq., or Abby Pendleton, Esq. at (248) 996-8510 or (212) 734-0128.

CMS Solicits Proposals For Participation In Medicare Imaging Demo

2010-08-02T15:33:16Z

On July 23, CMS published a notice in the Federal Register, soliciting proposals in a new imaging demonstration created under the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008.

The two-year Medicare Imaging Demonstration (MID) will test whether the use of decision supports systems (DSSs) can improve quality of care and reduce unnecessary radiation exposure and utilization by promoting appropriate ordering of advanced imaging services.

CMS would like to use "conveners" to reach eligible physicians interested in participating in the demonstrations. Conveners will be responsible for recruiting physician practices, deploying a DSS that incorporates medical specialty society guidelines for the selected procedures, ensuring the DSS remains current with those guidelines, collecting and transmitting data, and distributing payments to practices for reporting data. Accordingly CMS specifically would like the proposals from conveners to involve a diverse mix of physician practice sizes and types, medical specialties, and geographic areas. Applications to participate are due to CMS by September 21.

]]> For more information on this topic, feel free to call Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. or Carey F. Kalmowitz, Esq. of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510.

Radiology Clinic Pays $647,000 to Resolve Lawsuit Alleging it Billed Medicare for Unneeded Tests

2010-07-28T21:20:40Z

Advanced Radiology of Beverly Hills has agreed to pay the federal government $647,000 to settle allegations that they filed false claims with Medicare for unnecessary radiological tests. The United States civil lawsuit alleged that Advanced Radiology engaged in a scheme to bill Medicare for unnecessary tests performed at Advanced Radiology from 1999 through 2002. As part of the scheme, an Advanced Radiology contractor would recruit Medicare beneficiaries to undergo diagnostic tests, even though they were not needed.

The settlement resolves allegations initially made against Advanced Radiology in a "whistleblower" lawsuit filed pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow a private party to file a civil action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of the recovery.

The HLP recommends that you take a careful look at your documentation practices as regulatory compliance continues to take on critical importance in this health care environment.

]]> For more information on this topic, feel free to call Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. or Carey F. Kalmowitz, Esq. of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510.

Rite Aid Agrees to Pay $1 Million to Settle HIPAA Privacy Case

2010-07-28T17:22:33Z

For those providers and entities that think HIPAA violations are no big deal or that have yet to implement required policies and procedures, they are well advised to review the Department of Health and Human Services July 27, 2010 press release announcing a $1 million dollar settlement related to allegations of violations of HIPAA.

Rite Aid Corporation and its 40 affiliated entities (RAC) agreed to pay $1 million to settle violations under the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) which enforces the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules opened its investigation of RAC after a television media station reported on incidents where pharmacies were shown to have disposed of prescriptions and labeled pills bottles that contained individuals' identifiable information in trash containers accessible to the public.

Such an act of disposing of individuals' health information in places that is accessible to an unauthorized person is in violation of several requirements found in the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires health plans, health care clearinghouses and most health care providers including pharmacies, to protect the privacy of patient information, including such information during its disposal.

As part of the settlement agreement, Rite Aid also agreed to take the following corrective action to improve its policies and procedures to safeguard the privacy of its customers: (1) revise and distribute policies and procedures regarding disposal of protected health information and sanction workers who do not follow them; (2) train employees on the new requirements; (3) conduct internal monitoring; and (4) engage a qualified and independent third-party to conduct compliance reviews and render report to HHS.

]]> For more information regarding HIPAA or health information privacy matters, please contact Abby Pendleton, Esq. or Jessica L. Gustafson, Esq. at (248) 996-8510.

Gov. Paterson Orders Lawmakers Back To Discuss Budget, Medicaid

2010-07-26T14:06:31Z

Governor David Paterson has called for a mandatory session with the state legislature to address the remaining portion of the state budget. This comes after local governments around New York threatened to suspend their Medicaid payments to the state as a consequence of New York's chronic cash shortage. The special session will focus on passing a revenue bill, along with a contingency plan for the possible loss of more than $1 billion in federal Medicaid money.

While the state Senate remains hopeful that they will pass the revenue bill, the final bill requires reaching an agreement on a Medicaid contingency plan, SUNY empowerment and property tax relief. The Senate has thus far struggled to pull its members together to reach an agreement on the three proposals.

Further, while Paterson has used his power to call the Senate back for the special session, he cannot enforce them to act on any of his agenda items. If either chamber wants to ignore the governor, they can simply gavel in and gavel out in the space of a few minutes.

]]> For more information, please contact Adrienne Dresevic, Esq., Robert S. Iwrey, Esq., Carey Kalmowitz, Esq., or Abby Pendleton, Esq. at (212) 734-0128.

Hospice Providers Face Claims Scrutiny

2010-07-21T18:56:43Z

Hospice providers are facing ongoing claims scrutiny, highlighting the importance of compliance. On June 8, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") held a national outreach session to educate hospice providers regarding specific vulnerabilities involving hospice services, with specific emphasis on the provision of hospice services to beneficiaries residing in nursing facilities.

Two recent Office of Inspector General ("OIG") documents highlight this important issue. First, in September 2009, the OIG published a report entitled, "Medicare Hospice Care for Beneficiaries in Nursing Facilities: Compliance with Medicare Coverage Requirements." This OIG report concludes that 82 percent of hospice services provided to beneficiaries in nursing facilities in 2006 failed to meet Medicare coverage requirements. The report found that most deficiencies were related to the hospice's failure to comply with provisions of the hospice plan of care, failure to obtain valid hospice election statements, and failure to comply with hospice certification requirements. The report states that the information contained therein would be shared with the Recovery Audit Contractors ("RACs"); accordingly, providers may expect that the RACs may target hospices in conducting claims reviews.

A second OIG document entitled, "Medicare Hospice Care: Services Provided to Beneficiaries Residing in Nursing Homes," details the increase in hospice services provided to beneficiaries residing in nursing homes over time. The document further notes the high percentage of hospice patients that reside in nursing facilities who have ill-defined conditions or mental diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ("COPD"), unspecified heart disease, etc.).

These documents, together with the recent educational sessions put on by CMS, highlight the scrutiny under which hospice claims will be reviewed. Accordingly, it is imperative that hospice providers adopt and implement appropriate compliance procedures, not only with respect to technical issues (e.g., plan of care, election and certification requirements), but also with respect to eligibility issues (e.g., fully documenting a given patient's condition and signs and symptoms of decline to establish hospice eligibility, taking into account published Medicare policy guidance and local coverage decisions).

]]> For more information regarding the above-referenced reports or with respect to hospice services in general, please contact Abby Pendleton, Esq. or Jessica L. Gustafson, Esq. at (248) 996-8510.

$251M Medicare Bust Includes Detroit

2010-07-16T17:24:11Z

Federal authorities conducted the largest Medicare fraud bust ever in five different states (including Michigan and New York), arresting dozens of suspects accused in scams totaling $251 million. In total, 94 suspects have been indicted and 36 were arrested this morning including doctors and nurses in Detroit, New York City, Miami, Houston and Baton Rouge, La. They are accused of billing Medicare for unnecessary equipment, physical therapy and HIV treatments that patients typically never received.

In light of President Barack Obama's proposed health care overhaul, federal authorities have promised more money and manpower will go to fighting Medicare fraud. Around the country, Medicare fraud has evolved from tiny scams into schemes involving a sophisticated network of doctors, clinic owners, patients and patient recruiters. Violent criminals and mobsters have also begun to tap into the scams, viewing Medicare fraud as more lucrative than dealing drugs.

For instance, federal agents busted a medical center in Brooklyn, N.Y., charging eight people with running a $50-million scam that submitted bogus claims for physical therapy. The clinics owners were paying patients in exchange for their Medicare numbers and a bonus fee for recruiting new patients.

This comes after Federal authorities launched a strike force in Miami in 2007 to target the Medicare Fraud. The program has since expanded to seven cities (including Detroit and Brooklyn) leading to more than 720 indictments that collectively have billed the Medicare program more than $1.6 billion.

]]> For questions or concerns regarding government investigations, please contact Robert S. Iwrey, Esq., and for questions or concerns regarding fraud and abuse, please contact Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510.

OIG Plans to Scrutinize Medicare Part D Drug Claims

2010-07-16T13:40:09Z

Robert A. Vito, Acting Assistant Inspector General, CMS Audits, testified before the Subcommittees on Federal Financial Management of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Preventing and Recovering Government Payment Errors. In his testimony, Mr. Vito expressed concern over OIG's June 2010 report on Invalid Prescriber Identifiers on Medicare Part D Drug Claims, which revealed that CMS and its plan sponsors have not adequately performed one of the most basic oversight checks in Medicare Part D - ensuring that a drug was prescribed by a physician. The result lead to Part D sponsors and beneficiaries paying pharmacies $1.2 billion in 2007 for claims in which the prescriber identifiers listed on the claims did not correspond to practicing physicians.

One of the reasons for this vulnerability is the use of invalid prescriber identifiers on Part D claims. CMS contracts with sponsors to administer the Medicare Part D benefit and pay Part D claims. Sponsors then must submit electronic records, called prescription drug event (PDE) records, to CMS for any covered prescription that is filled, which usually requires an identifier for the drug's prescriber. However in the June 2010 report, it was found that more than 18 million PDE records contained invalid prescriber identifiers in 2007, representing 2 percent of the nearly 1 billion PDE records submitted to CMS that year.

Therefore, the OIG is proposing that Part D claims with invalid prescriber identifiers should be subjected to further review. The OIG recommends that, instead of implementing prepayment edits, CMS conduct periodic reviews to ensure the validity of prescriber identifiers used on PDE records. Additionally, CMS should require sponsors to institute procedures to flag any Part D claims with invalid identifiers in the prescriber identifier field.

The OIG therefore plans to ensure that Part D claims contain valid prescriber identifiers so that CMS and its contractors will no longer have difficulty performing oversight functions such as verifying the prescriber's licensing information, determining whether the prescriber has been the subject of disciplinary actions for inappropriate activities or tracking potential over-prescribing issues.

]]> For questions or concerns regarding government investigations of providers, please contact Robert S. Iwrey, Esq., of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510.

Physicians' Perceptions, Preparedness for Reporting, and Experiences Related to Impaired and Incompetent Colleagues

2010-07-14T14:49:08Z

A recent doctor survey study by the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) found that while physicians support the professional commitment to report all instances of impaired or incompetent colleagues, when faced with these situations, many do not report.

Conducted by a team from Massachusetts General Hospital, the study used data from 2009 national survey of close to 3,000 physicians practicing in a wide array of medical fields. The physicians were questioned in three areas: about their responsibility to report physicians who were incompetent or impaired by drugs or alcohol, their preparedness and comfort level doing so, and their experiences with colleagues with these issues.

While 70% of the physicians said they were prepared to report impaired physicians and 64% said they were prepared to report incompetent ones, more than one-third, 36%, said they do not feel obligated by professional commitment to do so.

Most states (including Michigan) impose a statutory duty on physicians to report other physicians who they know are impaired. Furthermore, for those physicians who suffer from impairment, most states (including Michigan) have health professional recovery programs which support the recovery of its participants so they may safely return to practice while protecting the safety of the general public. By contacting such programs voluntarily and participating in the program, the physician can often avoid a disciplinary action. However, such programs are not necessarily appropriate in every circumstance. The decision as to whether to self-report to such a program is an important one with many potential ramifications and should be made only after careful consideration. Consultation with an experienced health care attorney is also a prudent course of action in such matters.

]]> For more information on licensure or staff privilege matters, please contact Robert S. Iwrey, Esq. of The Health Law Partners at (248) 996-8510 or riwrey@thehlp.com.